By Arabella Hallawell
Gartner Inc.
The latest variant of the Sobig worm propagates via spamming techniques, and spammers have used the Sobig worm to send their e-mail messages. The best defence is to protect the enterprise at its boundary.
Event
On August 22, 2003, the Sobig.F worm attempted to connect to master servers, which the worm previously infected and controls. (The worm started spreading over the Internet on Aug. 18.) The worm retrieves an URL from which it downloads a Trojan horse file to the local computer. Then it executes the worm’s main program. The program files could potentially steal confidential information and could contain additional malicious code. Of the 20 identified master servers, only one was not shut down and directed traffic to a porn site. However, the worm can update the master list of servers during the payload launch time. Sobig.F will deactivate and shut down on September 10, 2003.
First Take
Sobig propagates using spammer techniques to trick e-mail recipients into opening messages, including the spoofing of sender addresses that are familiar to recipients. The second wave of the malicious code attack could have potentially unleashed a more potent payload in infected computers, but law enforcement, Internet service providers (ISPs), computer emergency response teams and security vendors mitigated the threat. Fortunately, the hijacked servers were based in North America and South Korea where ISPs and law enforcement have considerable leeway.
Spammers have used previous Sobig variants to get spam messages through. This blending of worms and spam indicate that spam – usually seen as a nuisance or legal risk – poses security risks, too. E-mail from spoofed addresses may not just be unwanted but may have attachments that contain malicious code. In response, enterprises should expand their security capabilities at the SMTP gateway. Like spam, worms such as Sobig succeed because e-mail inherently has weak authentication, and users have a permissive attitude toward messages that turn up in their mailboxes. Efforts by ISPs and carriers for more extensive blocking of addresses will help slow the flood of spam and stem e-mail as an easy vector for infection. Eventual standards for better authentication of e-mail will also help.
Recommendations:
Protecting against viruses requires more than traditional, regularly updated antivirus software:
– Check for and fix security holes on key servers and applications.
– Subscribe to security vulnerability alerts so that you can block ports and servers when indications of attacks are seen.
– Multiheaded threats like Sobig (and spammers) try to get past server-based antivirus controls. Add another layer of protection at the desktop with personal firewalls (especially for workers with broadband access).
– Examine SMTP server security hygiene to make sure these messaging servers cannot be hijacked and are not vulnerable to mass e-mail attacks.
– Turn off auto responses to outside recipients when viruses or spam are detected.
– Evaluate better trust models for e-mail, such as using signed e-mail or start to authenticate e-mail (for example, via challenge responses or lists of trusted external senders). Mostly consumer ISPs use challenge responses for e-mail, but they are awkward for widespread enterprise use.
Analytical Source: Arabella Hallawell, Gartner Research
Recommended Reading and Related Research
“Management Alert: The Need for E-Mail Security in a Growing Mobile World” – Enterprises considering a secure messaging solution should address six issues. By Joyce Graff
“‘SQL Slammer’ Lessons: Traditional Antivirus Is Not Enough” – The successful management of malicious-code threats is a more-complex enterprise initiative than simply installing and maintaining antivirus software. By Arabella Hallawell
(You may need to sign in or be a Gartner client to access all of this content.)
Entire contents
