EU lobbyists support Parliament patent stance
The Foundation for a Free Information Structure (FFII), a lobbying group with wide support from European open-source community advocates, has reversed its position concerning a software patent bill after the European Parliament on Wednesday handed a surprise victory to the opponents of software patents.
The FFII led a campaign to try to persuade members of the European Parliament to scrap a proposal for a European Union (E.U.)-wide law, officially called the directive on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions.
However, the text agreed in the European Parliament on Wednesday is so different from the original document written by the European Commission, that the FFII will now actively lobby to keep it.
“This is now our directive too. We must help the European Parliament defend it,” said Hartmut Pilch, president of FFII.
Advocates of open-source software applauded the Parliament’s move.
“We got everything we want,” said Laura Creighton, co-founder of Swedish GroupWare developer Strakt, and of British publishing software firm called Reportlab. Creighton has also lobbied alongside the FFII. People who fought hard to scrap the law will now fight just as hard to keep it in the shape the European Parliament proposed, she said.
“We are overjoyed with the courage of the European Parliament. By changing the text so much they have shown true leadership,” Creighton said.
The Commission as well as the Council of Ministers, the E.U.’s assembly of national government ministers, are likely to try to get some or all of the Parliament’s changes to the bill reversed.
“There will probably need to be some work to be done to reconcile the Parliament and the ministers’ positions,” said one E.U. diplomat on the normal condition of anonymity.
But he added that the differences of view could be overcome. “We are all agreed that Europe should not be allowed to register the sort of patents you find in the United States. Everyone agrees on that. Everyone wants this directive because the status quo is far from perfect. It isn’t impossible to reach agreement here,” he said.
The current patent regime in Europe, under the authority of the European Patent Office in Munich, outlaws patents for pure software.
However, some patents have sneaked through, prompting many critics to speculate that if left as they are, the E.U.’s patent laws will result in Europe drifting towards the U.S., which permits patents for some software applications.
Commission spokesman Jonathan Todd said the commission’s original version of the bill is a “good middle ground between the opposing arguments.” He added that the Commission will examine the Parliament’s amendments carefully.
Parliament and the Council must both sign up to the wording of a bill before it can be passed. If they fail to agree, the Commission steps in and hosts conciliation meetings and the three institutions try to reach agreement.Once the two houses do agree and the directive is adopted, then the 15 E.U. member states have around 18 months to write the directive into their national statute books.
